Weblog
Sunday, 11 October 2009
-
Revival - Something we all need
I recently recieved the following email about a series on revival by Dr. Martyn Lloyd-Jones that I think we all need to hear, (I know I do!)!
Dear Brothers and Sisters,
Please forgive the basic appearance of this eMail - I ran out of time to get it to our wonderful HTMLprofessional!
In 1959 my grandfather interrupted his weekly studies in the book of Ephesians to bring a six monthlong series on a subject that was very close to his heart - Revival. These messages were preached tocommemorate the great Revivals in1859 in various parts of the world.However, his objective was not just to provide us with a history lesson, but to give us an incisivecritique of the Church and its problems in 1959 - problems with which we are still struggling 50 yearslater. He did not want to just give us an analysis of the problems that we face, he also wanted to showour desperate need for the sovereign work of God in our day and generation. It is our desire that theLord will use this series to call his people to prayer that He might, once again "rend the heavens andcome down" (Isaiah 64:1).
These sermons will be on Oneplace.com in October and November, and we hope that you will have achance to listen in.
As always, we only want to send these eMails to those who want to receive them, so if you havereceived this in error, please accept my apologies. You can hit "unsubscribe" at the bottom of thiseMail and Groundspring will remove you from the database.
Every blessing,
Jonathan----------------------------------------
Our postal address isPost Office Box 113Middleburg, Virginia 20118United States
Sunday, 07 June 2009
-
What is SIN - part 2
What is SIN - 2
Introduction
The existence of sin is an undeniable fact. No man can examine his own nature, or observe the conduct of his fellow men, without having the conviction forced upon him that there is such an evil as sin. This is not a purely moral or theological question. It falls also within the province of philosophy, which assumes to explain all the phenomena of human nature as well as of the external world. Philosophers, therefore, of every age and of every school, have been compelled to discuss this subject. The philosophical theories, as to the nature of sin, are as numerous as the different schools of philosophy. This great question comes under the consideration of the Christian theologian with certain limitations. He assumes the existence of a personal God of infinite perfection, and he assumes the responsibility of man. No theory of the nature or origin of sin which conflicts with either of these fundamental principles, can for him be true. Before entering upon the statement of any of the theories which have been more or less extensively adopted, it is important to ascertain the data on which the answer to the question, What is sin-? is to be determined; or the premises from which that answer is to be deduced. These are simply the declarations of the word of God and the facts of our own moral nature. Ignoring either wholly or in part these two sources of knowledge, many philosophers and even theologians, have recourse to the reason, or rather to the speculative understanding, for the decision of the question. This method, however, is unreasonable, and is sure to lead to false conclusions. (Charles Hodge - Systematic Theology)
As we saw in my previous post, the Hebrew word chata and its equivalent Greek word hamartano primarily mean to miss the mark. We will next look at the words used for guilt.A. Asham (H816-819) 1.a primitive root; to be guilty; by implication to be punished or perish :- × certainly, be (-come, made) desolate, destroy, × greatly, be (-come, found, hold) guilty, offend (acknowledge offense), trespass.2.guilt; by implication a fault; also a sin-offering :- guiltiness, (offering for) sin, trespass (offering). 3. guilty; hence presenting a sin-offering :- one which is faulty, guilty 4. guiltiness, a fault, the presentation of a sin-offering :- offend, sin, (cause of) trespass (-ing, offering). (Strong's Greek & Hebrew Dictionary)
- Asham and its derivative are used over 100 times in the Old Testament.
2Or if anyone touches an unclean thing, whether the carcass of an unclean wild beast or of an unclean domestic animal or of unclean creeping things that multiply prolifically, even if he is unaware of it, and he has become unclean, he is guilty (asham). 3Or if he touches human uncleanness, of whatever kind the uncleanness may be with which he becomes defiled, and he is unaware of it, when he does know it, then he shall be guilty (asham). Leviticus 5:2-3
- Notice here that in one case you are guilty even if you are unaware but in the other case you aren't guilty until you become aware.
- Do not accuse and hurt a servant before his master, lest he curse you, and you be held guilty (asham) [of adding to the burdens of the lowly]. Proverbs 30:10
- [She] said, Why then have you planned such a thing against God's people? For in speaking this word the king is like one who is guilty (ashem), in that [he] does not bring home his banished one. 2 Samuel 14:13
- Here King David is guilty of a double standard.
- "he contradicts and condemns himself, in swearing that her son who had killed his brother should not die, nor an hair of his head be hurt, but should be in the utmost safety; and yet he sought to put his own son to death for a like crime,...." (John Gill)
- And said, You shall not bring the captives in here; we are guilty (ashmah) before the Lord already, and what you intend will add more to our sins and our guilt (ashmah). For our trespass (guilt) (ashmah) is great, and there is fierce anger against Israel. 2 Chronicles 28:13
- Asham and it derivatives can also be translated:
- Trespass — Then said the man [an angel] to me, The north chambers and the south chambers, which are opposite the yard, are the holy chambers where the priests who approach the Lord shall eat the most holy offerings; there shall they lay the most holy things--the meal offering, the sin offering, and the trespass or guilt offering— for the place is holy. Ezekiel 42:13
- Desolate — Joel 1:18 How do the beasts groan! the herds of cattle are perplexed, because they have no pasture; yea, the flocks of sheep are made desolate. (KJV)
- Offense — I will return to My place [on high] until they acknowledge their offense and feel their guilt and seek My face; in their affliction and distress they will seek, inquire for, and require Me earnestly, saying, Hosea 5:15
B. The equivalent Greek word is: Enochos (G1777) liable to (a condition, penalty or imputation):—in danger of, guilty of, subject to. (Strong's Greek & Hebrew Dictionary)
21You have heard that it was said to the men of old, You shall not kill, and whoever kills shall be liable (enochos) to and unable to escape the punishment imposed by the court. 22But I say to you that everyone who continues to be angry with his brother or harbors malice (enmity of heart) against him shall be liable (enochos) to and unable to escape the punishment imposed by the court; and whoever speaks contemptuously and insultingly to his brother shall be liable (enochos) to and unable to escape the punishment imposed by the Sanhedrin, and whoever says, You cursed fool! [You empty-headed idiot!] shall be liable (enochos) to and unable to escape the hell (Gehenna) of fire. Mathew 5:21-22
- For whosoever keeps the Law [as a] whole but stumbles and offends in one [single instance] has become guilty (enochos) of [breaking] all of it. James 2:10
- So then whoever eats the bread or drinks the cup of the Lord in a way that is unworthy [of Him] will be guilty (enochos) of [profaning and sinning against] the body and blood of the Lord. 1 Corinthians 11:27
- Hebrews 2:15 and release those who through fear of death were all their lifetime subject to (enochos) bondage. (NKJV)
C. No matter how you look at it, both word ultimately mean we are guilty before God.
Saturday, 30 May 2009
-
What is SIN - part 1
What is SIN - part 1
Introduction
The existence of sin is an undeniable fact. No man can examine his own nature, or observe the conduct of his fellow men, without having the conviction forced upon him that there is such an evil as sin. This is not a purely moral or theological question. It falls also within the province of philosophy, which assumes to explain all the phenomena of human nature as well as of the external world. Philosophers, therefore, of every age and of every school, have been compelled to discuss this subject. The philosophical theories, as to the nature of sin, are as numerous as the different schools of philosophy. This great question comes under the consideration of the Christian theologian with certain limitations. He assumes the existence of a personal God of infinite perfection, and he assumes the responsibility of man. No theory of the nature or origin of sin which conflicts with either of these fundamental principles, can for him be true. Before entering upon the statement of any of the theories which have been more or less extensively adopted, it is important to ascertain the data on which the answer to the question, What is sin-? is to be determined; or the premises from which that answer is to be deduced. These are simply the declarations of the word of God and the facts of our own moral nature. Ignoring either wholly or in part these two sources of knowledge, many philosophers and even theologians, have recourse to the reason, or rather to the speculative understanding, for the decision of the question. This method, however, is unreasonable, and is sure to lead to false conclusions. (Charles Hodge - Systmeatic Theology)
As we saw in my previous post, there are many definitions for sin. All of them are correct if we are talking in theological terms, and I am not going to attempt to talk about sin in non-theological terms. One of the problems defining sin is language. The Old Testament was written in Hebrew while the New Testament was primarily written in Greek. I am not a Hebrew or Greek scholar so I'm going to rely on several dictionaries to define the words for sin as well as other words translated from the root Hebrew or Greek word. I will note Strong's Hebrew or Greek number but I will not use the punctuated versions of these words.
A. Chata (H2398) >
A primitive root; properly to miss; hence (figuratively and generally) to sin; by inference to forfeit; lack, expiate, repent, (causatively) lead astray, condemn:—bear the blame, cleanse, commit [sin], by fault, harm he hath done, loss, miss, (make) offend (-er), offer for sin, purge, purify (self), make reconciliation, (cause, make) sin (-ful, -ness), trespassive
- Chata and its derivitives occurs over 500 times in the Old testament.
- Now all the people perceived the thunderings and the lightnings and the noise of the trumpet and the smoking mountain, and as [they] looked they trembled with fear and fell back and stood afar off. And they said to Moses, You speak to us and we will listen, but let not God speak to us, lest we die. And Moses said to the people, Fear not; for God has come to prove you, so that the [reverential] fear of Him may be before you, that you may not sin (chata)." Exodus 20:20
- This law, which is so extensive that we cannot measure it, so spiritual that we cannot evade it, and so reasonable that we cannot find fault with it, will be the rule of the future judgment of God, as it is for the present conduct of man. If tried by this rule, we shall find our lives have been passed in transgressions. (Matthew Henry)
- Desire without knowledge is not good, and to be overhasty is to sin (chata) and miss the mark. Proverbs 19:2
- Thy as hard as we can and we still miss the mark!
- Chata is also translated —
- faults — Then the chief butler said to Pharaoh, I remember my faults (chata) today. Genesis 41:9
- blame — Genesis 43:9 "I will be security for him; you shall require him of me [personally]; if I do not bring him back to you and put him before you, then let me bear the blame (chata) forever."
- offenses — Ecclesiastes 10:4 "If the temper of the ruler rises up against you, do not leave your place [or show a resisting spirit]; for gentleness and calmness prevent or put a stop to great offenses."
- Now all the people perceived the thunderings and the lightnings and the noise of the trumpet and the smoking mountain, and as [they] looked they trembled with fear and fell back and stood afar off. And they said to Moses, You speak to us and we will listen, but let not God speak to us, lest we die. And Moses said to the people, Fear not; for God has come to prove you, so that the [reverential] fear of Him may be before you, that you may not sin (chata)." Exodus 20:20
B. Hamartano (G264) >
properly to miss the mark (and so not share in the prize), that is, (figuratively) to err, especially (morally) to sin:—for your faults, offend, sin, trespass.
- Harmartano and its derivitive are the Greek equivalent to chata and are used about 300 times in the New Testament. In fact, harmartano and its derivitives were used to translate chata and its family in the Septuagint.
- What then [are we to conclude]? Shall we sin (hamartano) because we live not under Law but under God's favor and mercy? Certainly not! Romans 6:15
- As for those who are guilty and persist in sin (hamartano), rebuke and admonish them in the presence of all, so that the rest may be warned and stand in wholesome awe and fear. 1 Timothy 5:20
- No one who abides in Him [who lives and remains in communion with and in obedience to Him--deliberately, knowingly, and habitually] commits (practices) sin (harmatano). No one who [habitually] sins (harmartano) has either seen or known Him [recognized, perceived, or understood Him, or has had an experiential acquaintance with Him]. 1 John 3:6
- Shun immorality and all sexual looseness [flee from impurity in thought, word, or deed]. Any other sin (harmartema) which a man commits is one outside the body, but he who commits sexual immorality sins (harmatano) against his own body. 1Corinthians 6:18
- Here the two other derivitives of harmartano are used.
- This does not teach that sexual immorality is greater than any other sin; but it does teach that it is altogether unique in its effects on the body; not so much in its physical as in its moral and spiritual effects. The idea runs through the Bible that there is something mysterious in sexual intercourse, and in the effects which flow from it. Every other sin, however degrading and ruinous to the health, even drunkenness, is external to the body, that is, external to its life. But sexual immorality, involving as it does a community of life, is a sin against the body itself, because it is incompatible with the purpose of its creation, and with its immortal destiny. (Hodge's Commentary on the First Epistle to the Corinthians)
- But if, while we seek to be justified by Christ, we ourselves also are found sinners (harmartolos), is Christ therefore a minister of sin (harmartia)? Certainly not! Galatians 2:17
- Here two more derivitives are used.
-
Some interpreters think, that the apostle here begins his discourse to the Galatians upon the main argument of his Epistle, viz. justification by faith in Christ; though others think it began, Gal 2:15. If, while we seek to be justified by Christ, we ourselves also are found sinners; if (saith the apostle) you make us grievous offenders in our expectation of being justified by Christ, and not by the works of the law, you make Christ the minister of sin, who hath taught us this. But others think that the apostle here obviateth a common objection which was then made, (as it is also in our age), against the doctrine of justification by faith in Christ; viz. That it opens a door of liberty to the flesh, and so makes Christ a minister of sin, as if he relaxed men's obligation to the law of God; which is the same objection which the apostle answered in his Epistle to the Romans, Rom 6:1-23. If while, we plead for justification by Christ, we live in a course of notorious disobedience to the law of God, then Christ must be to us a minister of sin, and come into the world to purchase for us a possibility of salvation, though we live in never so much notorious disobedience to the law of God. As if there were no obligation upon men to keep the law, unless by their obedience to it they might obtain pardon of sin and justification. This calumny the apostle disavows, first, by a general aversation: God forbid! (Matthew Poole's Commentary on the Holy Bible)
C. The general idea of chātaʾ and hamartia is that all wrongdoing is a failure, "missing the mark" which God intends for all persons to attain. Man, as made in the image of God, has implanted within him an innate sense to live as God directs. Every departure from this sense is a coming short of the purpose for which man was made, a missing of the mark. This failure to hit the mark is always a sin against God; that is, the sinner always fails to achieve the standard set or to hit the mark established by God.[Günther, "hamartia," DNTT, 3:579; Walter Grundmann and Gustav Stählin, "hamartanō," TDNT, 1:289, 295] The moral connotations of the concept stipulate that a person misses the right mark because he intentionally chooses to aim at a wrong mark; he misses the right path because he deliberately chooses to follow a wrong path.[Smith, The Bible Doctrine of Sin, 17] We miss the mark and sin against God when, for example, we fail to love our brother, since loving our brother inevitably follows a true love for God.[Erickson, Christian Theology, 587] With regard to moral culpability, there is no question of an innocent mistake or a negative idea of failure. The terms suggest an active, deliberate missing of the right mark or way in order to choose intentionally a wrong mark or path. The sinner is responsible and accountable for the behavior that results in missing the mark, whether overtly intentional or not.[Fiedler, "hamartia," EDNT, 1:66] (A Theology for the Church) - Chata and its derivitives occurs over 500 times in the Old testament.
Monday, 11 May 2009
-
What is SIN?
What is SIN?
Introduction
I am going to interrupt our studies to discuss an important topic. I am going to be quoting from "A Theology for the Church" by Danial L. Akin. All Bible quotes are from the Amplified Bible at BibleGateway.com.
Since the fall, no one has been able to elude the entanglements of their own sinfulness. No matter how enlightened we may be or how advanced our technological discoveries, we still find ourselves ravaged by hatred, lust, rage, and covetousness. We contend against the adversary of our ancestors: the sin that resides within each of us. We do not like to think of ourselves as helpless, yet the doctrine of sin reminds us that we are unable to extricate ourselves from the grip of our sinfulness.
These misunderstandings about the nature of sin may stem in part from the demise of meaningful and honest discourse on the subject. Although important and relevant, the topic of sin is not the most popular of issues. Modern attitudes about the subject consider it either unpleasant and inappropriate or irrelevant and passé. Recent years have witnessed a decline even in the use of the word. Several years ago, psychiatrist Karl Menninger wrote a book entitled Whatever Became of Sin? In this work Menninger called attention to the fact that "sin" is an all-but-extinct term in the American vocabulary. He noted that simply removing the word sin from our collective vocabularies would not make it disappear. Menninger argued for an understanding of sin that included willful rebellion against the standards of God.
We should take this observation to heart. We deceive ourselves if we believe that we can either minimize or eliminate the reality of sin simply by ignoring it or changing its name. Redefinitions or misunderstandings about sin do not lessen our accountability. We should also admit that such evasive efforts are themselves manifestations of sin. We live in an age that strives to ease or eradicate moral and spiritual culpability; to confess our sinfulness will painfully confront us with our shortcomings and accentuate our guilt. Our unwillingness or failure to address sin truthfully will not, however, achieve our liberation from its insidious presence, power, and penalty. The rejection of the biblical doctrine of sin does not invalidate its reality or power. To disregard the reality of sin will eventuate in individual and societal destruction. (A Theology for the Church)
Definitions
American Tract Society Bible Dictionary
Any thought, word, desire, action, or omission of action, contrary to the law of God, or defective when compared with it.
Baker's Evangelical Dictionary of Biblical Theology
Sin is a riddle, a mystery, a reality that eludes definition and comprehension. Perhaps we most often think of sin as wrongdoing or transgression of God's law. Sin includes a failure to do what is right. But sin also offends people; it is violence and lovelessness toward other people, and ultimately, rebellion against God. Further, the Bible teaches that sin involves a condition in which the heart is corrupted and inclined toward evil.
Is "any want of conformity unto or transgression of the law of God" (1 John 3:4; Romans 4:15), in the inward state and habit of the soul, as well as in the outward conduct of the life, whether by omission or commission (Romans 6:12-17; 7:5-24). It is "not a mere violation of the law of our constitution, nor of the system of things, but an offence against a personal lawgiver and moral governor who vindicates his law with penalties. The soul that sins is always conscious that his sin is (1) intrinsically vile and polluting, and (2) that it justly deserves punishment, and calls down the righteous wrath of God. Hence sin carries with it two inalienable characters, (1) ill-desert, guilt (reatus); and (2) pollution (macula).", A.A.Hodge's Outlines.
A Biblical Definition
For whatever does not originate and proceed from faith is sin [whatever is done without a conviction of its approval by God is sinful]. Romans 14:23
My definition
Sin is anything, known or unknown, that keeps anyone from being like Christ. See 1 Peter 1:15-16
Additional sources for definitions may be found at http://www.studylight.org/dic/
Sunday, 19 April 2009
-
What Nation Would Abandon God? - part 2
Jer 2:11 "Has a nation changed its gods, Which are not gods? But My people have changed their Glory For what does not profit."
Rom 3:1-8 "What advantage then has the Jew, or what is the profit of circumcision? Much in every way! Chiefly because to them were committed the oracles of God. For what if some did not believe? Will their unbelief make the faithfulness of God without effect? Certainly not! Indeed, let God be true but every man a liar. As it is written: "That You may be justified in Your words, And may overcome when You are judged." But if our unrighteousness demonstrates the righteousness of God, what shall we say? Is God unjust who inflicts wrath? (I speak as a man.) Certainly not! For then how will God judge the world? For if the truth of God has increased through my lie to His glory, why am I also still judged as a sinner? And why not say, "Let us do evil that good may come"?; as we are slanderously reported and as some affirm that we say. Their condemnation is just."
Review
- The Glory was God’s Presence.
- Israel was exalted by having been given God’s Word.
- Israel was exalted because she had the way of salvation revealed to her.
- Glory Rejected in Favor of Lies
- Israel declined and fell into ruin because of ignoring God’s Word.
John 8:33-41 They answered Him, "We are Abraham's descendants, and have never been in bondage to anyone. How can you say, 'You will be made free'?" Jesus answered them, "Most assuredly, I say to you, whoever commits sin is a slave of sin. And a slave does not abide in the house forever, but a son abides forever. Therefore if the Son makes you free, you shall be free indeed. I know that you are Abraham's descendants, but you seek to kill Me, because My word has no place in you. I speak what I have seen with My Father, and you do what you have seen with your father." They answered and said to Him, "Abraham is our father." Jesus said to them, "If you were Abraham's children, you would do the works of Abraham. But now you seek to kill Me, a Man who has told you the truth which I heard from God. Abraham did not do this. You do the deeds of your father." Then they said to Him, "We were not born of fornication; we have one Father; God."
Matt 3:7-9 "But when he saw many of the Pharisees and Sadducees coming to his baptism, he said to them, "Brood of vipers! Who warned you to flee from the wrath to come? Therefore bear fruits worthy of repentance, and do not think to say to yourselves, 'We have Abraham as our father.' For I say to you that God is able to raise up children to Abraham from these stones."
1. The Jewish concept of salvation was that if you were a covenant member of Israel, you were going to end up in heaven, though you might have to pay for some of your sins for a time. Their great objection to Paul’s applying his general principles of justice to their case was that their situation was peculiar: ‘God has chosen us as his people in Abraham. If we retain our relation to him by circumcision and the observance of the law, we shall never be treated or condemned as the Gentiles.’
That such was the doctrine of the Jews is shown by numerous passages from their writings. "If a Jew commit all manner of sins," says Abarbanel, "he is indeed of the number of sinning Israelites, and will be punished according to his sins; but he has, notwithstanding, a portion in eternal life." The same sentiment is expressed in the book Torath Adam, fol. 100, in nearly the same words, and the reason assigned for it, "That all Israel has a portion in eternal life." 9 This is a favorite phrase with the Rabbins, and frequently occurs in their writings. Justin Martyr, as quoted by Grotius on chap. 2:13, attributes this doctrine to the Jews of his day: "They suppose that to them universally, who are of the seed of Abraham, no matter how sinful and disobedient to God they may be, the eternal kingdom shall be given." This interpretation, therefore, makes the verse in question present the objection which the Jews would be most likely to urge. ( Kirk Douglas)
It cannot escape notice how completely the doctrine of the Jews has been transferred by ritualists to Christianity. They held that if a man was circumcised and remained within the Theocracy, he might be punished for his sins, but he would ultimately be saved. So ritualists hold that all who are baptized and remain within the pale of the true Church, though they may suffer for their sins here or hereafter (in purgatory) are certain to be finally saved. (Charles Hodge)
2. There are too many in this day who have a similar concept of salvation.
a. God saves all the "good old boys". b. Being associated with a church will do it.
c. Being associated with a quasi-religious fraternal organization will do it.
d. Just believing that God exists will do it.
3. The Unbelieving Fundamentalist! — Some folks don’t believe, in spite of the advantages they have been given.
'For what if some did not believe? Will their unbelief make the faithfulness of God without effect? Certainly not! Indeed, let God be true but every man a liar. As it is written: "That You may be justified in Your words, And may overcome when You are judged."'
4. Dumb idea #1—Taking care of unrighteous religious people makes God look good.
Such is the apostle’s argument against the grounds of confidence on which the Jews rested their hope of exemption from condemnation. ‘Our unfaithfulness serves to commend the faithfulness of God, therefore we ought not to be punished.’ According to this reasoning, says Paul, the worse we are, the better: for the more wicked we are, the more conspicuous will be the mercy of God in our pardon; we may therefore do evil that good may come.’ (Charles Hodge)
"But if our unrighteousness demonstrates the righteousness of God, what shall we say? Is God unjust who inflicts wrath? (I speak as a man.) Certainly not! For then how will God judge the world?"
One great wicked man, in years past, muttered the following words as he lay dying—"God will forgive, it is His job!" WRONG! God is going to judge the world, and unless you have lived a life of absolute perfection and conformity with His Law, you will be judged guilty and sentenced to everlasting punishment.
OR, unless you have a Substitute who has taken the punishment for you already.
5. Dumb idea #2 — By sinning, we can make God look better when He pardons us.
"For if the truth of God has increased through my lie to His glory, why am I also still judged as a sinner? And why not say, "Let us do evil that good may come"?; as we are slanderously reported and as some affirm that we say. Their condemnation is just."
Matt 5:17-20 "Do not think that I came to destroy the Law or the Prophets. I did not come to destroy but to fulfill. For assuredly, I say to you, till heaven and earth pass away, one jot or one tittle will by no means pass from the law till all is fulfilled. Whoever therefore breaks one of the least of these commandments, and teaches men so, shall be called least in the kingdom of heaven; but whoever does and teaches them, he shall be called great in the kingdom of heaven. For I say to you, that unless your righteousness exceeds the righteousness of the scribes and Pharisees, you will by no means enter the kingdom of heaven."
- Bible Christianity is NOT unlawful.
- Bible Christianity does NOT say we may live as we please.
- Bible Christianity re-affirms, within the New Testament, 9 of the ten commandments, and all of the moral regulations which stem from those commandments.
- A Bible-believing Christian is expected to grow in grace and live a life that conforms to the moral teachings found in the Bible.
- Bible Christianity merely points out that is obvious about the Law — The Law cannot save because we are too wicked, and we cannot meet the standard of the Law.
- There is a perversion of the doctrine of Eternal Security which teaches "once professed, surely possessed — once I have made that profession, I am saved, secure, and safe, no matter what I do."
C. Conclusion — Let me assure you, that is false. The Bible teaching is that once someone is truly saved, they will not lose God’s salvation, because He will not let them go. However, once someone is TRULY saved, their life will grow to reflect that fact. If there is no evidence in your life that God has saved you, the chances are very great that He has NOT saved you, and you stand in need of salvation right now.
1. We should feel the peculiar responsibilities which rest upon us as the inhabitants of a Christian country, as members of the Christian Church, and possessors of the word of God; as such, we enjoy advantages for which we shall have to render a strict account, vers. 1, 2. 2. It is a mark of genuine piety, to be disposed always to justify God, and to condemn ourselves. On the other hand, a disposition to self-justification and the extenuation of our sins, however secret, is an indication of the want of a proper sense of our own unworthiness and of the divine excellence, vers. 4, 5.
3. Beware of any refuge from the fear of future punishment, founded upon the hope that God will clear the guilty, or that he will not judge the world and take vengeance for our sins, vers. 6, 7.
4. There is no better evidence against the truth of any doctrine, than that its tendency is immoral. And there is no greater proof that a man is wicked, that his condemnation is just, than that he does evil that good may come. There is commonly, in such cases, not only the evil of the act committed, but that of hypocrisy and duplicity also, ver. 8.
© Charles T. Buntin



